An elderly widow who is battling cancer has been convicted by a fast-track court after she forgot to insure her late husband’s car.
The grief-stricken pensioner, aged 81, said the mix-up happened when she fell ill and went to stay with her daughter in the run-up to Christmas, shortly after her husband has died.
His Volkswagen Polo was transferred into her name after he passed away, and the DVLA spotted it had not been insured by its new registered keeper on 3 December last year.
The widow, from Liverpool, penned a letter, explaining her “confusion, illness, bereavement and absence from home”, and revealing that she has now been diagnosed with cancer.
But the letter of mitigation was not enough to stop the criminal prosecution, which was dealt with in the controversial fast-track Single Justice Procedure.
In her letter, the pensioner wrote: “I am 81 years old and was recently widowed following the death of my husband late last year.
“During this difficult period, the vehicle was transferred into my name and I was unfamiliar with the insurance requirements following the transfer.
“I had also been unwell since before Christmas and spent a period staying with my daughter in London for support and care.
“As a result, I did not receive the earlier correspondence regarding this matter and was unaware that there was an issue requiring my attention.
“Since then, I have sadly been diagnosed with cancer and have been undergoing hospital treatment.
“This has been an extremely distressing and difficult time for me.
“I would never intentionally keep a vehicle uninsured, and this situation arose due to confusion, illness, bereavement and absence from home rather than any deliberate action.”
She added: “I respectfully ask the court to take these circumstances into consideration when deciding the outcome of my case.
“Looking forward to a positive response.”
Prosecutors at the DVLA do not routinely see letters of mitigation entered in the Single Justice Procedure due to the fast-track design of the process, missing the chance to withdraw cases that are not in the public interest.
Magistrate Ellie Parry, sitting in Lincoln, accepted the woman’s guilty plea to a charge of keeping a motor vehicle which does not meet insurance requirements.
She was handed a six-month conditional discharge, with an order to pay a £26 victim surcharge.
The case is the latest example of a vulnerable person being convicted in the fast-track courts of not paying a household bill.
The Labour Government consulted last spring on possible changes to the Single Justice Procedure, including a rule that prosecutors like the DVLA must see mitigation letters to decide whether to withdraw cases that are not in the public interest.
Since the consultation closed in early May 2025, no changes to the system have been announced and an estimated 800,000 criminal cases have passed through the courts.
The DVLA, in its response to the Government’s consultation, supported the idea of prosecutors seeing all mitigation letters.
The DVLA has also encouraged anyone being prosecuted who has powerful mitigation to contact the agency directly.